Glutamate, D-(2)-2-Amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate do not directly modulate glycine receptors

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Replication studies play an essential role in corroborating research findings and ensuring that subsequent experimental works are interpreted correctly. A previously published paper indicated that the neurotransmitter glutamate, along with the compounds N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and D-(2)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5), acts as positive allosteric modulators of inhibitory glycine receptors. The paper further suggested that this form of modulation would play a role in setting the spinal inhibitory tone and influencing sensory signaling, as spillover of glutamate onto nearby glycinergic synapses would permit rapid crosstalk between excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Here, we attempted to replicate this finding in primary cultured spinal cord neurons, spinal cord slice, and Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing recombinant human glycine receptors. Despite extensive efforts, we were unable to reproduce the finding that glutamate, AP5, and NMDA positively modulate glycine receptor currents. We paid careful attention to critical aspects of the original study design and took into account receptor saturation and protocol deviations such as animal species. Finally, we explored possible explanations for the experimental discrepancy. We found that solution contamination with a high-affinity modulator such as zinc is most likely to account for the error, and we suggest methods for preventing this kind of misinterpretation in future studies aimed at characterizing high-affinity modulators of the glycine receptor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aubrey, K. R., Sheipouri, D., Balle, T., Vandenberg, R. J., & Otsu, Y. (2020). Glutamate, D-(2)-2-Amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate do not directly modulate glycine receptors. Molecular Pharmacology, 98(6), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1124/MOLPHARM.120.000127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free