Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists

87Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rapid automatized naming (RAN; Denckla & Rudel, 1976) tasks are consistent predictors of fluency that also discriminate between dyslexic and nondyslexic reading groups. The component processes of RAN that are responsible for its relationship with reading ability remain underspecified, however. We report a study on dyslexic and nondyslexic adult groups that experimentally manipulated RAN formats to elucidate how different components of RAN differentially influence dyslexic and nondyslexic performance. The dyslexic group showed a pervasive deficit in rapid access of individually presented items. Additionally, they showed a significant impairment when multiple items were presented, whereas nondyslexic readers showed marginal facilitation for this format. We discuss the implications of these findings with respect to reading-group differences in reading fluency. © 2009 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., & Louise Kelly, M. (2009). Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.567

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free