Digital auscultation analysis for heart murmur detection

97Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This work presents a comparison of different approaches for the detection of murmurs from phonocardiographic signals. Taking into account the variability of the phonocardiographic signals induced by valve disorders, three families of features were analyzed: (a) time-varying & time-frequency features; (b) perceptual; and (c) fractal features. With the aim of improving the performance of the system, the accuracy of the system was tested using several combinations of the aforementioned families of parameters. In the second stage, the main components extracted from each family were combined together with the goal of improving the accuracy of the system. The contribution of each family of features extracted was evaluated by means of a simple k-nearest neighbors classifier, showing that fractal features provide the best accuracy (97.17%), followed by time-varying & time-frequency (95.28%), and perceptual features (88.7%). However, an accuracy around 94% can be reached just by using the two main features of the fractal family; therefore, considering the difficulties related to the automatic intrabeat segmentation needed for spectral and perceptual features, this scheme becomes an interesting alternative. The conclusion is that fractal type features were the most robust family of parameters (in the sense of accuracy vs. computational load) for the automatic detection of murmurs. This work was carried out using a database that contains 164 phonocardiographic recordings (81 normal and 83 records with murmurs). The database was segmented to extract 360 representative individual beats (180 per class). © 2008 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Delgado-Trejos, E., Quiceno-Manrique, A. F., Godino-Llorente, J. I., Blanco-Velasco, M., & Castellanos-Dominguez, G. (2009). Digital auscultation analysis for heart murmur detection. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9611-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free