Influence of non-orthodontic intervention on digit sucking and consequent anterior open bite: A preliminary study

9Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to assess behavioural and occlusal outcomes of non-orthodontic intervention (NOI) in a sample of children, 4-12 years of age, in Australia, in order to establish clinical relevance. Materials and methods Data from 91 patient records of 4- to 12-year-old children reporting a habit of digit sucking, from two clinics in north-eastern Australia, were de-identified and used. Each patient had been examined at two visits, separated by an interval of 4 months, using standard clinical procedures. Results Of the 77 children who received a 4-month NOI, 69 (89.6%) had ceased their digit sucking habit by the end of the NOI period [χ2 = 67.0, degrees of freedom (d.f.) = 1, P < 0.001]. Of the 72 subjects who had front teeth, the number with anterior open bite decreased from 37 (51.4%) to 12 (16.7%) upon completion of NOI (χ2 = 21.3, d.f. = 1, P < 0.001). Among the 32 patients with a measurable overjet, the mean overjet was found to decrease from 4.2 ± 2.4 mm to 3.1 ± 1.9 mm after implementation of NOI (t = 5.8, d.f. = 31, P < 0.001). Children who received NOI were more likely to quit the digit sucking habit in the 4-month period (P < 0.001, OR = 51.8, 95% CI: 9.8-273.9) and were more likely to appear without anterior open bite at a 4-month recall (P < 0.001, OR = 30.0, 95% CI: 5.9-151.6). Conclusions This study demonstrated clinical relevance of NOI on the cessation of a digit sucking habit, closure of anterior open bite and reduction of overjet. Further investigations are indicated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, B., Lejarraga, C., Franco, C. S., Kang, Y., Lee, A., Abbott, J., … Pumtang-On, P. (2015). Influence of non-orthodontic intervention on digit sucking and consequent anterior open bite: A preliminary study. International Dental Journal, 65(5), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12178

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free