Medical Malpractice Implications of Clinical Practice Guidelines

13Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines aim to improve medical care by clarifying and making useful recommendations to providers. Although providers should account for patients’ unique characteristics when determining a treatment plan, it is generally perceived as good practice to follow guidelines when applicable. This is of interest in malpractice litigation, where it is essential to establish a standard of care to evaluate the performances of providers. Although the opinions of expert witnesses are used to determine standards of care, guidelines are expected to play a leading role. Guidelines alone should not establish a legal standard but may help inform this discussion in the courtroom. Therefore, it is incumbent that excellent, practical, and timely guidelines are continually created and updated in a transparent way. These guidelines must be very clear and underscore the various strengths of recommendation based on the quality of available evidence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruhl, D. S., & Siegal, G. (2017, August 1). Medical Malpractice Implications of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817707943

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free