Patient preferences toward herpes zoster vaccination among individuals aged 50 years or older in South Korea: Findings from a discrete choice experiment

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In South Korea, the increasing incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) and aging population warrant consideration of HZ vaccination for older adults. There is a need to understand the HZ vaccine-related preferences of adults aged ≥50 years and adult children (working or financially independent adults contributing to healthcare decision-making for their parents aged ≥50 years). A discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit HZ vaccine preferences of the HZ-naïve general public aged ≥50 years (n = 500), current/former HZ patients aged ≥50 years (n = 150), and adult children (n = 150). An online questionnaire was administered through March–May 2023; for each preference-elicitation question, respondents selected between three hypothetical HZ vaccine profiles, characterized by five attributes with varying levels, or “no vaccine”. Respondents generally accepted an increased number of doses (from one to two) for a longer protection duration (from ≥4 to ≥7 or ≥10 years). By mean relative importance (RI), protection duration (RI: 37.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.0%, 38.1%), lifetime HZ risk reduction (27.3%; 95% CI: 26.3%, 28.4%) and short-term side effects (14.9%; 95% CI: 14.1%, 15.6%) had the strongest impact on respondents’ HZ vaccine decision-making. Adult children viewed short-term side effects with significantly greater RI than the general public and current/former HZ patients (19.1%, 13.5%, 15.2%, respectively, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shantakumar, S., Choo, E. J., Parikh, R., Kwon, T., Kim, H., Vandervoort, L., … Lee, J. (2025). Patient preferences toward herpes zoster vaccination among individuals aged 50 years or older in South Korea: Findings from a discrete choice experiment. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2469419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free