Conversion of Kelp Debris and Faecal Material from the Mussel Aulacomya ater by Marine Micro-Organisms

  • Stuart V
  • Newell R
  • Lucas M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Freshly powdered kelp debris from Laminaria pallida is characterised by a high C/N ratio of approximately 8.0, whereas material which has passed through the gut of the dominant kelp bed suspension-feeding bivalve Aulacornya ater has a reduced carbon content and a C/N ratio of 4.8. This suggests that Aulacomya ater may derive a substantial proportion, possibly amounting to as much as 40-50 % of its carbon requirements by absorption of the more labile carbon components of its diet whereas the more refractory components are returned to the environment as faeces. Both freshly- fragmented kelp debris and faecal material are colonised by bacteria which are subsequently replaced by flagellates and ciliates whose biomass commonly reaches approximately 10 % of that of the bacterial prey density. Calculation of the conversion efficiency of carbon into the carbon equivalent of bacterial biomass suggests that an efficiency of 10-15 % is achieved by the bacteria which colonise particulate debris, irrespective of the fact that the faecal material may be different in composition from that of freshly-fragmented kelp. Approximately 85-90 % of the fragmented kelp which is not consumed by the filter-feeders and the processed faecal material in the water column is mineralised within 33 d at 10 "C. The residual 10-15 % assimilated into bacteria could represent a potential food resource for the consumer community. Because of the relatively low conversion of particulate carbon into bacteria, however, it is suggested that their trophic significance as a carbon resource is likely to be small in coastal waters

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stuart, V., Newell, R., & Lucas, M. (1982). Conversion of Kelp Debris and Faecal Material from the Mussel Aulacomya ater by Marine Micro-Organisms. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 7, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps007047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free