Rock magnetic record of the last glacial-interglacial cycle from the Kurtak loess section, southern Siberia

52Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Detailed rock magnetic investigations, grain size determination and X-ray diffraction were carried out on loess and buried soils of the last glacial-interglacial cycle from Kurtak, southern Siberia. The susceptibility and the sand fraction of > 63 μm fluctuate in parallel, suggesting that the higher susceptibility values in the loess horizons are mainly associated with the coarse size fraction. The frequency dependence of the magnetic susceptibility of the loess and buried soils is very low and uniform, indicating the absence of superparamagnetic grains and negligible pedogenically induced enhancement of magnetic susceptibility. The magnetic assemblage is dominated by multidomain-like magnetic grains. Maghemite and haematic are also present in the buried soils and loess horizons. Goethite may have been formed from gleying or water-logging processes under a cooler and more humid climate. The coarse magnetite grains, which contribute significantly to magnetic susceptibility, are probably carried by valley winds and derived from local sources. Thus, the coarser magnetite grains with higher susceptibility values in the loess horizons could mainly reflect stronger wind intensity during cold and semi-arid conditions, and the consequent ease with which dense magnetite particles can be transported. The lower susceptibility values in the buried soil horizons are mainly caused by weaker wind intensity during interglacial and interstadial periods, although post-depositional processes associated with gleying modifications are also partially responsible for the observations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, R. X., Matasova, G., Kazansky, A., Zykina, V., & Sun, J. M. (2003). Rock magnetic record of the last glacial-interglacial cycle from the Kurtak loess section, southern Siberia. Geophysical Journal International, 152(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01829.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free