Privilege and burden of im-/mobility governance: On the reinforcement of inequalities during a pandemic lockdown

55Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In order to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, nation states have focused on the governance of im-/mobilities: certain mobility restrictions have been enforced, while simultaneously some forms of mobility have been maintained or even enhanced in order to keep the system running in crisis mode. With a special focus on Austria, we analyse the specific politics of im-/mobilities concerning the organization of paid work and show how the socio-spatial conditions of who is permitted, denied or urged to work are inextricably linked to inequalities. It becomes apparent that while in principle all bodies are equally dependent on collective social relations and enduring infrastructure, not everybody contributes equally to their maintenance. In fact, the governance of im-/mobilities follows and reinforces already prevalent inequality regimes based on class, gender and migration relations, thereby differentiating between bodies perceived as highly valuable and worth protecting and those categorized as less valued and potentially disposable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dobusch, L., & Kreissl, K. (2020). Privilege and burden of im-/mobility governance: On the reinforcement of inequalities during a pandemic lockdown. Gender, Work and Organization, 27(5), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12462

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free