Abstract
© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press. Background: There are limited data on the clinical benefits of adding surgical resection in patients with focally progressive gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of resection plus imatinib dose escalation or maintenance (S group) with imatinib dose escalation alone (NS group) in patients with advanced GIST following focal progression (FP) with standard doses of imatinib. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 patients with advanced GISTs who experienced FP with standard doses of imatinib were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary endpoints were time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Results: Compared with the NS group (n = 52), patients in the S group (n = 38) had a higher proportion of primary tumor site involvement and lower tumor burden at FP. With a median follow-up duration of 31.0 months, patients in the S group had significantly better TTF and OS than patients in the NS group (median TTF: 24.2 vs. 6.5 months, p
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cho, H., Ryu, M.-H., Lee, Y., Park, Y. S., Kim, K.-H., Kim, J. H., … Kang, Y.-K. (2019). Role of Resection Following Focal Progression with Standard Doses of Imatinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Results of Propensity Score Analyses. The Oncologist, 24(12), e1443–e1449. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0009
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.