QLIF-17. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CERN FOUNDATION ADULT EPENDYMOMA OUTCOMES PROJECT

  • Acquaye A
  • Vera E
  • Gilbert M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Outcomes projects can be a catalyst in determining disease and treatment- related consequences for patients with rare tumors and in identifying ways to educate patients and providers. The Adult Ependymoma Outcomes (AEO) survey uses self-reported experiences to evaluate how this tumor impacts patients throughout their illness. Patients completed the AEO survey via web-based portal. The survey includes questions on treatment, tumor recurrence, current health status, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain and Spine Module and the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. The sample included 264 participants (female=54%), with a median age of 46 (18-77), who were married (65%) with at least a college education (37%). Radiation treatment was more commonly used in patients with brain involvement (X2 (1) =20.7, p<0.001), who underwent a partial resection (21%, X2 (3) =15.4, p<0.001), or with a grade 3 tumor (13%, X2 (2) =18.8, p<0.001). Recurrence occurred in a small group (29%), with Grade 1 tumor patients 2.6 times and Grade 3 tumor patients 2.5 times more likely to have recurrence compared to those with Grade 2 tumors. Spine tumor patients had a higher symptom burden (mean=2.8; scale 0 to 10) than brain tumor patients (mean=1.9, t (247) =-4.0) and reported more moderate to severe symptoms (rating ≥ 5) (29%) compared to their counterparts (18%). Within physical health of the SF-36, spine patients reported worse health in bodily pain (mean=49.1, v mean=72.1, t (249) =6.8 p<0.001), physical functioning (mean=51.6, v mean=67.8, t (252) =4.1, p<0.001), and vitality (mean=40.9, v mean=50.1, t (202.2) =3.0, p<0.003). These results demonstrate the feasibility in implementing outcome projects that report on the clinical and demographic characteristics of a rare patient population and underscore the importance of outcomes data in understanding disease-related issues. This also supports future studies focusing on specific areas that can potentially improve aspects patient care and overall well-being.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acquaye, A. A., Vera, E., Gilbert, M. R., & Armstrong, T. S. (2016). QLIF-17. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CERN FOUNDATION ADULT EPENDYMOMA OUTCOMES PROJECT. Neuro-Oncology, 18(suppl_6), vi159–vi159. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now212.662

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free