The accuracy of an ambulatory level III sleep study compared to a level I sleep study for the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in children with neuromuscular disease

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Objectives: Polysomnography (PSG) surveillance recommendations are not being met for children with neuromuscular disease (NMD) because of limited diagnostic facilities. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an ambulatory level III device as compared to a level I PSG. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric institution. Eligibility criteria included: (1) children with NMD; (2) age 6 to 18 years; (3) booked for a clinically indicated overnight level I PSG. Participants were randomized to an overnight level I PSG followed by an ambulatory level III study with end tidal carbon dioxide (etCO 2 ) or vice versa. Sensitivity and specificity of the ambulatory level III device to diagnose sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) at an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cutoff of > 1.0 events/h was the primary outcome. Results: Moderate to severe SDB was found in 46% of participants (13/28). The device's sensitivity and specificity to detect SDB was 61.5% and 86.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the level III study was 80.0% and the negative predictive value was 72.0%. Fifty percent of the cohort were either missing or had incomplete or falsely low ambulatory etCO 2 data. Conclusions: A level III device with etCO 2 is not yet able to be implemented in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool for SDB in pediatric patients with NMD. Commentary: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1973.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fishman, H., Massicotte, C., Li, R., Zabih, W., McAdam, L. C., Al-Saleh, S., & Amin, R. (2018). The accuracy of an ambulatory level III sleep study compared to a level I sleep study for the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in children with neuromuscular disease. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 14(12), 2013–2020. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7526

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free