Perbandingan Sistem Pengawasan Lembaga Antikorupsi Di Asia Pasifik

Abstract

This study discusses the comparison of the monitoring system of anti-corruption institutions in Asia-Pacific countries, including Indonesia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Singapore. Through this comparative study, it is hoped that there will be a more proportional formulation of a supervisory system for anti-corruption institutions, especially in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical legal research method with a comparative approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials obtained through literature studies and analyzed in a normative juridical manner. This study concludes that the comparative analysis of the anti-corruption agency supervisory system in Asia-Pacific, there are three trends. Low supervision system (laden with intervention) with low political will like Myanmar, proportional supervision but relatively low political will-both like Indonesia and Malaysia, and classic monitoring system (by executive, legislative and internal) but high political will like Hong Kong and Singapore.