Do Audit Committees and Auditors Coordinate Effort? Evidence from Risk Areas, Materiality, and Meetings

11Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We provide evidence on effort coordination and information sharing between audit committees and external auditors. We use four effort measures: the risk areas reported by both the auditor and committee, auditor-reported materiality, and committee meetings. We find that the number of risks reported by the auditor (committee) is positively related to the number of risks reported by the committee (auditor) and that lower materiality is associated with more risks that the committee discloses. The evidence also suggests that although risk areas are “sticky,” the committee identifies new risks faster, whereas the auditor focuses on shared risks. Next, our analysis indicates that audit process standardization influences reporting quality in a nonlinear manner. Finally, although audit fees tend to rise with auditor effort, they are unrelated to the committee’s effort. Our findings endorse the service perspective on auditing by emphasizing the collaborative nature of the audit process over individual actors’ self-interests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Livne, G., Tsipouridou, M., & Wood, A. (2024). Do Audit Committees and Auditors Coordinate Effort? Evidence from Risk Areas, Materiality, and Meetings. Accounting Review, 99(3), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2020-0441

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free