Fibrinolytic Strategy for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

  • Engel Gonzalez P
  • Omar W
  • Patel K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in additional challenges for systems designed to perform expeditious primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. There are 2 important considerations: the guideline-recommended time goals were difficult to achieve for many patients in high-income countries even before the pandemic, and there is a steep increase in mortality when primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be delivered in a timely fashion. Although the use of fibrinolytic therapy has progressively decreased over the last several decades in high-income countries, in circumstances when delays in timely delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention are expected, a modern fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy may need to be considered. The purpose of this review is to systematically discuss the contemporary role of an evidence-based fibrinolytic reperfusion strategy as part of a pharmacoinvasive approach, in the context of the emerging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Engel Gonzalez, P., Omar, W., Patel, K. V., de Lemos, J. A., Bavry, A. A., Koshy, T. P., … Kumbhani, D. J. (2020). Fibrinolytic Strategy for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.120.009622

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free