Posture and performance: Sitting vs. standing for security screening

45Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A classification of the literature on the effects of workplace posture on performance of different mental tasks showed few consistent patterns. A parallel classification of the complementary effect of performance on postural variables gave similar results. Because of a lack of data for signal detection tasks, an experiment was performed using 12 experienced security operators performing an X-ray baggage-screening task with three different workplace arrangements. The current workplace, sitting on a high chair viewing a screen placed on top of the X-ray machine, was compared to a standing workplace and a conventional desk-sitting workplace. No performance effects of workplace posture were found, although the experiment was able to measure performance effects of learning and body part discomfort effects of workplace posture. There are implications for the classification of posture and performance and for the justification of ergonomics improvements based on performance increases.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drury, C. G., Hsiao, Y. L., Joseph, C., Joshi, S., Lapp, J., & Pennathur, P. R. (2008). Posture and performance: Sitting vs. standing for security screening. Ergonomics, 51(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701628790

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free