Consolidation therapy with antimetabolite-based therapy in standard- risk acute lymphocytic leukemia of childhood: A pediatric oncology group study

30Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To develop antimetabolite-based consolidation regimens that minimize acute and long-term toxicities and improve the survival rate of children with standard-risk B-lineage acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Patients and Methods: Seven hundred twenty-seven eligible patients with standard-risk early pre-B ALL were registered onto the study. Seven hundred sixteen patients attained a complete remission (CR) after induction therapy. Of these, 114 patients were randomized to a different regimen and were the subject of a separate report. Six hundred two patients were randomized to receive one the following regimens: intermediate-dose methotrexate (IDMTX) with leucovorin rescue on weeks 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, and 22 (regimen A); regimen A plus asparaginase (ASP) administered intramuscularly (IM) weekly for 24 weeks (regimen B); or regimen A plus a 24-hour infusion of cytarabine (AraC) with each IDMTX (regimen C). After consolidation, patients were placed on maintenance therapy through week 156. Regimens A and C were opened in February 1986, and regimen B in May 1987. Comparisons are based on concurrently randomized patients (May 1987 to January 1991 between regimens A and B, and February 1986 to January 1991 between regimens A and c). Results: The 5-year continuous CR (CCR) rates were not significantly different: A versus B, 78. 1% (3.9 ± SE) versus 83.3% ± 3.5% and A versus C, 79.4% ± 3.2% versus 83.5% ± 2.9%; P by one-sided log-rank tests were .27 and .34, respectively. Significant treatment differences were not found with regard to sex, rate of testicular and CNS relapse, or CNS complications. During consolidation, regimen C had significantly more bacterial infections (P = .0032) and days spent in the hospital (P < .001) compared with regimen A. Conclusion: We were unable to show a statistical advantage of adding either ASP or AraC to IDMTX in terms of improvement in event-free survival (EFS).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, M. B., Shuster, J. J., Pullen, D. J., Borowitz, M. J., Carroll, A. J., Behm, F. G., & Land, V. J. (1998). Consolidation therapy with antimetabolite-based therapy in standard- risk acute lymphocytic leukemia of childhood: A pediatric oncology group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(8), 2840–2847. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2840

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free