Management of a submacular hemorrhage secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of three treatment modalities

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the effects of three treatment modalities for a submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Seventy-seven patients with an SMH were divided into three groups: small-sized (optic disc diameter (ODD) ≥ 1 to < 4), medium-sized (ODD ≥ 4 within the temporal arcade) and large-sized (ODD ≥ 4, exceeding the temporal arcade). Patients received anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy, pneumatic displacement (PD) with anti-VEGF or a vitrectomy with a subretinal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and gas tamponade based on the surgeon’s discretion. The functional and anatomical outcomes were evaluated. Among the 77 eyes, 45 eyes had a small-sized, 21 eyes had a medium-sized and 11 eyes had a large-sized SMH. In the small-sized group, all treatment modalities showed a gradual best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement with high hemorrhagic regression or displacement rates (over 75%). In the medium-sized group, PD and surgery were associated with better BCVA with more displacement than anti-VEGF monotherapy (67% and 83%, respectively, vs. 33%). In the large-sized group, surgery showed a better visual improvement with a higher displacement rate than PD (86% vs. 25%). Our findings demonstrated that visual improvement can be expected through appropriate treatment strategy regardless of the SMH size. In cases with a larger SMH, invasive techniques including PD or surgery were more advantageous than anti-VEGF monotherapy.