Bond strength and microleakage of self-adhesive and conventional fissure sealants

28Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS), failure modes (adhesive, cohesive, or mixed), and marginal microleakage occurrence of conventional resin (CR)-based, glass ionomer (GI)-based, and self-adhesive resin (SAR)-based fissure sealants with or without prior phosphoric acid (PA) etching. Fifty extracted premolars were randomly and equally assigned into five groups -G1:PA+CR, G2:PA+GI, G3:GI, G4:PA+SAR, and G5:SAR. Prior PA etching significantly (p<0.05) increased the SBSs of sealants. Adhesive failure mainly occurred in teeth treated with SAR-or GI-based fissure sealants, and cohesive failure mainly occurred in PA-etched teeth. Microleakage occurrence differed significantly (p<0.05) among the five groups of treated teeth. We concluded that conditioning of a tooth's enamel surface is crucial to creating strong bonds and leak-free sealing between tooth and fissure sealant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simsek Derelioglu, S., Yilmaz, Y., Celik, P., Carikcioglu, B., & Keles, S. (2014). Bond strength and microleakage of self-adhesive and conventional fissure sealants. Dental Materials Journal, 33(4), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free