Tokenization Repair in the Presence of Spelling Errors

3Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider the following tokenization repair problem: Given a natural language text with any combination of missing or spurious spaces, correct these. Spelling errors can be present, but it’s not part of the problem to correct them. For example, given: “Tispa per isabout token izaionrep air”, compute “Tis paper is about to-kenizaion repair”. We identify three key ingredients of high-quality tokenization repair, all missing from previous work: deep language models with a bidirectional component, training the models on text with spelling errors, and making use of the space information already present. Our methods also improve existing spell checkers by fixing not only more tokenization errors but also more spelling errors: once it is clear which characters form a word, it is much easier for them to figure out the correct word. We provide six benchmarks that cover three use cases (OCR errors, text extraction from PDF, human errors) and the cases of partially correct space information and all spaces missing. We evaluate our methods against the best existing methods and a non-trivial baseline. We provide full reproducibility under https://ad.cs.uni-freiburg.de/publications .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bast, H., Hertel, M., & Mohamed, M. M. (2021). Tokenization Repair in the Presence of Spelling Errors. In CoNLL 2021 - 25th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings (pp. 279–289). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free