Testing the Intuitive Retributivism Dual Process Model

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research on the motives individuals have to punish criminal offenders suggests that punitive reactions are primarily driven by retributive, not utilitarian, motives. To explain this, several authors have suggested a dual process model (DPM) of punitive reactions. According to this model, punitive reactions are the product of two distinct types of processing (type I and type II), which differentially support retributive vs. utilitarian punishment motives. In response to cases of criminal wrongdoing, type I swiftly outputs a retributive reaction. In contrast, for utilitarian motives to play a role, this reaction has to be overridden by type II processing, which only happens rarely. In this article, we argue that despite its popularity, there is little concrete evidence for the DPM. We then report the results of a preregistered study investigating the effect of increased processing effort on retributive vs. utilitarian punitive reactions. We argue that the results fail to support the DPM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rehren, P., & Zisman, V. (2022). Testing the Intuitive Retributivism Dual Process Model. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 230(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000461

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free