Natural Law, Catholicism, and the Protestant Critique: Why We Are Really Not That Far Apart

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Catholics and Evangelical Protestants often find themselves on the same side on a variety of issues in bioethics. However, some Evangelicals have expressed reluctance to embrace the natural law reasoning used by Catholics in academic and policy debates. In this article, I argue that the primary concerns raised by Evangelicals about natural law reasoning are, ironically, concerns expressed by and intrinsic to the natural law tradition itself. To show this, I address two types of Protestant critics: (1) the Frustrated Fellow Traveler and (2) the Solo Scripturist.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beckwith, F. J. (2019). Natural Law, Catholicism, and the Protestant Critique: Why We Are Really Not That Far Apart. Christian Bioethics, 25(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbz001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free