The Impact of Ignoring a Crossed Factor in Cross-Classified Multilevel Modeling

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study investigated estimate biases in cross-classified random effect modeling (CCREM) and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) when ignoring a crossed factor in CCREM considering the impact of the feeder and the magnitude of coefficients. There were six simulation factors: the magnitude of coefficient, the correlation between the level 2 residuals, the number of groups, the average number of individuals sampled from each group, the intra-unit correlation coefficient, and the number of feeders. The targeted interests of the coefficients were four fixed effects and two random effects. The results showed that ignoring a crossed factor in cross-classified data causes a parameter bias for the random effects of level 2 predictors and a standard error bias for the fixed effects of intercepts, level 1 predictors, and level 2 predictors. Bayesian information criteria generally outperformed Akaike information criteria in detecting the correct model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S., Jeong, Y., & Hong, S. (2021). The Impact of Ignoring a Crossed Factor in Cross-Classified Multilevel Modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637645

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free