A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid

16Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent clinical trials have suggested that a combination of folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. However, this regimen has been complicated by potentially life threatening toxicity. Regional delivery of folinic acid via a hepatic artery catheter might be expected to reduce systemic exposure and subsequent adverse effects. The present study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous and intra-hepatic arterial infusions of folinic acid in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n = 6) who were being treated with weekly regional infusions of 5-FU. The mean area under the plasma concentration - time curve, the peak plasma concentration and the steady state volume of distribution were 163 μg ml-1 h-1 (SD 41), 18. 5 μg ml-1 (SD 1. 2) and 7. 41 m-2 (SD 0. 44) respectively following intravenous administration of folinic acid compared with 142 μg ml-1h-1 (SD45), 14. 8 μg ml-1 (SD 2. 4) and 11. 21m-2 (SD 1. 22) following intra-hepatic arterial administration (P<0. 05). Regional folinic acid was therefore associated with a statistically significant reduction in systemic exposure compared with the intravenous route. © Macmillan Press Ltd., 1992.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, J. H., Kerr, D. J., Setanoians, A., Cooke, T. G., & McArdle, C. S. (1992). A pharmacokinetic comparison of intravenous versus intra-arterial folinic acid. British Journal of Cancer, 65(1), 133–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1992.26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free