Abstract
Valdes et al. contest our results, suggesting failings in our modeling approach as well as in our comparison with data. Although their comment points to interesting ideas of improvement, we find that their critique reflects an incomplete understanding of our methods and is not supported by the material they provide.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Botsyun, S., Sepulchre, P., Donnadieu, Y., Risi, C., Licht, A., & Rugenstein, J. K. C. (2019). Response to Comment on “revised paleoaltimetry data show low Tibetan Plateau elevation during the Eocene.” Science, 365(6459). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax8990
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free