Robot-assisted vs freehand cannulated screw placement in femoral neck fractures surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:Several studies have reported that medical robot-assisted method (RA) might be superior to conventional freehand method (FH) in orthopedic surgery. Yet the results are still controversial, especially in terms of femoral neck fractures surgery. Here, 2 methods were assessed based on current evidence.Methods:Electronic databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science. and EMBASE were selected to retrieved to identify eligible studies between freehand and RAs in femoral neck fractures, with 2 reviewers independently reviewing included studies as well as collecting data.Results:A total of 5 studies with 331 patients were included. Results indicated that 2 surgical methods were equivalent in terms of surgical duration, Harris score, fracture healing time, fracture healing proportion and complications, while RA showed clinical benefits in radiation exposure, intraoperative bleeding, total drilling times, and screw parallelism.Conclusions:Current literature revealed significantly difference between 2 techniques and suggested that RA might be beneficial for patients than freehand method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, F., Lu, J., & Qian, Y. (2021, May 21). Robot-assisted vs freehand cannulated screw placement in femoral neck fractures surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free