Long term clinical outcome and bleeding complications among hospital survivors with acute coronary syndromes

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the 21 month clinical outcome and bleeding complications in hospital survivors with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who were discharged with combined clopidogrel and aspirin anti-thrombotic therapy, and compare with those having ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were discharged with aspirin alone. Design: Observational study. Setting: A large university hospital. Patients: 224 patients were admitted to hospital with either NSTEACS or STEMI, and survived to discharge between 1 October 2001 and 31 December 2002. Main outcome measures: Cardiovascular death, total death, new myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalisation, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, coronary revascularisation; and fatal, life threatening, major and minor bleeding over 21 months after discharge. Results: Despite having no or small infarct (median maximum creatine kinase 155 v 1295 u/l; p<0.001 ) and taking more antianginal drugs, patients with NSTEACS had similar rates of cardiovascular death (9.5% v 8.3%; P = NS), new myocardial infarction (9.5% v 6.5%; p = NS) or unstable angina requiring hospitalisation (15.5% v 10.2%; p = NS) when compared with STEMI. Fatal, life threatening or major bleeding were <1% in both groups (p = NS); and minor bleeding occurred in 4.3% NSTEACS and 2.8% STEMI patients respectively (p = NS). Conclusions: Patients with NSTEACS had a similar and unfavourable long term outcome when compared with STEMI. There was no difference in serious bleeding complications between both groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, P., Robinson, A., Shaw, S., & Rodrigues, E. (2006). Long term clinical outcome and bleeding complications among hospital survivors with acute coronary syndromes. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82(965), 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2005.040097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free