Global models predict clouds at the wrong time of day: Does it matter for radiation and climate?

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of future climate change hinges upon the ability of Earth system models (ESMs) to simulate clouds and their radiative effects. Even if an ESM can simulate the correct clouds, a systematic error in the amount of sunlight reflected by clouds (and, thus, cloud radiative effect) can exist if the clouds are simulated at the incor rect time of day. In this work, we develop an analytical model connecting diurnal cloud biases to emergent mean state radiative biases. With the use of satellite observations, we demonstrate that there are errors in the time of day that clouds are occurring in ESMs that would cause bias in shortwave cloud radiative effect (SWCRE) that is greater than 45% of the total SWCRE bias, but such errors in the cloud diurnal cycle are masked by other compen sating errors, indicating that these ESMs are getting the right answer for the wrong reasons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aerenson, T., McCoy, D., Elsaesser, G., Wu, J., Nugent, J. M., Brown, H., … Zelinka, M. D. (2025). Global models predict clouds at the wrong time of day: Does it matter for radiation and climate? Science Advances , 11(51), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ady3236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free