An evaluation of the microscopical counting methods of the tape in hirst-burkard pollen and spore trap

192Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Three different sampling units in current use and different sampling strategies were tested. Randomly placed microscope fields are good in estimating the daily mean concentration, but very big sample size is needed. Traverses across the slide in systematic order are best to estimate the shortterm concentrations and diurnal variation. A formula for the estimation of the error in one transverse traverse is given. Twelve transverse traverses in systematic order is also enough to estimate the daily mean concentration. One or two traverses along the length of the slide give often unreliable estimates because of the irregularities in the transverse variation of the particle concentrations on the slide. For the same reason it is not safe to choose an “effectively collecting area”. Instead the whole width of the tape should be studied. © 1981 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Käpylä, M., & Penttinen, A. (1981). An evaluation of the microscopical counting methods of the tape in hirst-burkard pollen and spore trap. Grana, 20(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173138109427653

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free