To Be or Not to Be a Member of a Grassroots Institution: Evidence from a Social Network Analysis in Rural Areas of Ghana

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the seminal work of Olson (1965), social interactions have become an increasingly influential component of economic reasoning. While not much was written on the topic in the immediate aftermath of publication, Olson’s basic reasoning lies at the root of the recent rapid expansion of social-network literature in economics. Brock and Durlauf (2001) and Manski (1993, 2000) survey a range of contexts in which social networks have been used to explain individual and aggregate outcomes in economics. In the case of developing countries, Mulangu (2014) points out that social networks are important catalysts—influencing the efficiency of exchanges; serving as insurance, especially in the realm of microfinance; and facilitating marketing and technology transfer in agrarian economies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Depetris Chauvin, N., Porto, G., & Mulangu, F. (2017). To Be or Not to Be a Member of a Grassroots Institution: Evidence from a Social Network Analysis in Rural Areas of Ghana. In Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development (pp. 175–192). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53858-6_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free