Creating value and mitigating harm: Assessing institutional objectives in Australian industrial relations

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The degree to which legislation on labour relations and other societal institutions creates value and mitigates harm is explored in this article through a framework designed to guide both the authoring and the analysis of objects of such legislation. Creating value and mitigating harm are typically explicit in the objects of public policy and implicit in adjudication, administration and adherence under public policies. Although conceptually distinct, creating value and mitigating harm can be both complementary and detrimental to each other. This article reviews various combinations of legislative objects over more than a century of Australian labour and employment relations policy. The objects examined include the prevention of industrial disputes, the introduction of a social minimum wage, the expansion of enterprise bargaining, expansion or curtailment of tribunal powers by government and other developments. Questions of ‘for whom?’ value is created or harm is mitigated are key. As an inductive study, the article concludes with hypotheses to guide future research, including implications that reach beyond Australia and employment legislation. JEL Codes: K31; K38; M14; M52.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. E., & Isaac, J. (2018). Creating value and mitigating harm: Assessing institutional objectives in Australian industrial relations. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 29(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304618767263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free