Reintensification and eyewall formation in strong shear: A case study of Typhoon Noul (2015)

12Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Strong vertical wind shear produces asymmetries in the eyewall structure of a tropical cyclone (TC) and is generally a hostile environment for TC intensification. Typhoon Noul (2015), however, reintensified and formed a closed eyewall despite 200-850-hPa vertical shear in excess of 11 m s-1. Noul's reintensification and eyewall formation in strong shear were examined by using Doppler radar and surface observations. The evolution of the azimuthal-mean structure showed that the tangential wind at 2-km altitude increased from 30 to 45 m s-1 in only 5 h. During the first half of the reintensification, the azimuthal-mean inflow penetrated into the ~40-km radius, well inside the radius of maximum wind (RMW), at least below 4-km altitude, and reflectivity inside the RMW increased. As for the asymmetric evolution, vigorous convection, dominated by an azimuthal wavenumber-1 asymmetry, occurred in the downshear-left quadrant when shear started to increase and then moved upshear. A mesovortex formed inside the convective asymmetry on the upshear side. The direction of vortex tilt between the 1- and 5-km altitudes rotated cyclonically from the downshear-left to the upshear-right quadrant as the vortex was vertically aligned. In conjunction with the alignment, the amplitude of the wavenumber-1 convective asymmetry decreased and a closed eyewall formed. These features are consistent with the theory that a vortex can be vertically aligned through upshear precession. The analysis results suggest that the vortex tilt, vigorous convection, and subsequent intensification were triggered by the increase in shear in a convectively favorable environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shimada, U., & Horinouchi, T. (2018). Reintensification and eyewall formation in strong shear: A case study of Typhoon Noul (2015). Monthly Weather Review, 146(9), 2799–2817. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0035.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free