Comparison of electrochemical immunosensors and aptasensors for detection of small organic molecules in environment, food safety, clinical and public security

52Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We review here the most frequently reported targets among the electrochemical immunosensors and aptasensors: antibiotics, bisphenol A, cocaine, ochratoxin A and estradiol. In each case, the immobilization procedures are described as well as the transduction schemes and the limits of detection. It is shown that limits of detections are generally two to three orders of magnitude lower for immunosensors than for aptasensors, due to the highest affinities of antibodies. No significant progresses have been made to improve these affinities, but transduction schemes were improved instead, which lead to a regular improvement of the limit of detections corresponding to ca. five orders of magnitude over these last 10 years. These progresses depend on the target, however.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piro, B., Shi, S., Reisberg, S., Noël, V., & Anquetin, G. (2016, February 29). Comparison of electrochemical immunosensors and aptasensors for detection of small organic molecules in environment, food safety, clinical and public security. Biosensors. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios6010007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free