The arrow and the trap. Figures of Human Finitude in a Funerary Discourse by Kierkegaard

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper describes Kierkegaard’s position on death as it appears in an exhortative writing belonging to his collection of Edifying Discourses. It is argued that the original position elaborated in this Discourse both (i) draws on Epicurus’ famous argument against the fear of death and (ii) refutes that argument by highlighting its phenomenological inadequacy, rather than invalidating its deductive structure. The central element of Kierkegaard’s refutation consists in enabling a reference to death that forsakes its hypothetical character by turning extinction into a pervasive danger, that is coextensive with life as a whole. Such a reference is what the philosopher names “the serious thought of death”, i.e., an intentional state which manages to subtract the limit of existence from its peripheral and anonymous condition. From an Epicurean standpoint, death is peripheral insofar as it circumscribes existence without ever being a part of it; and death is anonymous insofar as it befalls the species as such, or the individual only insofar as it is a member of the species. Kierkegaard’s antidote to Epicurus’ argument personalizes death and turns it into an impending menace to be felt at every moment.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Figueroa-Weitzman, R., & Mittelmann, J. (2025). The arrow and the trap. Figures of Human Finitude in a Funerary Discourse by Kierkegaard. Anales Del Seminario de Historia de La Filosofia, 42(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.5209/ashf.91969

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free