Approaches to comparing spatial planning instruments across national systems

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter includes a detailed explanation of the rationale behind the selection of countries and describes each case study. It presents the main lines of comparison among national spatial planning systems and highlights their limitations. This chapter also outlines the features of spatial planning instruments at the urban level, particularly focusing on spatial plans. The classifications made are then linked to the aims and research questions of the book. Following this, this chapter discusses the unique characteristics of the spatial planning systems in the countries under study, with an emphasis on their common features. It explains how these features should be described and related to the different systems of each country. Additionally, this chapter indicates the research limitations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nowak, M. J., Mitrea, A., Dühr, S., Gagakuma, D., Peña, S., Pierri-Daunt, A. B., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2025). Approaches to comparing spatial planning instruments across national systems. In The Protection of Green Spaces for Climate Change Adaptation: Planning Systems, Policies and Instruments (pp. 19–31). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032645407-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free