Home advantage and LBW decisions: The contribution of umpiring to the home-ground (dis)advantage in cricket

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether elite cricket umpires' decisions contribute to home advantage via leg-before-wicket decisions. Design: Leg-before-wicket decisions (n = 4971) from actual elite level cricket matches in Australia between 2009 and 2016 were analysed using a binomial logistic regression to predict the umpires' leg-before-wicket decisions. Methods: Regressions were performed to determine whether the batter's team (home or away) influenced the likelihood that the umpire would give them out leg-before-wicket. Results: We found no evidence of home advantage in umpires' leg-before-wicket decisions. In fact, we found evidence that umpires in some instances disadvantage the home team. Conclusions: We suggest that the increased professionalism of sports officials, and the scrutiny they are placed under, may lead umpires to reduce or even overcompensate for any existing biases in their decision making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adie, J. M., Renshaw, I., Polman, R., & Mann, D. L. (2022). Home advantage and LBW decisions: The contribution of umpiring to the home-ground (dis)advantage in cricket. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 25(6), 520–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2022.01.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free