Asociación entre la fuerza de las piernas y el área de sección muscular transversal del músculo cuádriceps femoral y el grado de actividad física en octogenarios

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Aging is a complex physiological process whose main feature is the progressive loss of functionality, which may be delayed or attenuated by improving physical fitness. Objective: To determine the association between leg strength and the muscle cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris in relation to physical activity level in the elderly. Materials and methods: Thirty-two functionally autonomous people over 80 years (men: 82.80±2.09 years; women: 83.77±4.09 years) participated in this study. The Barthel Index, the Yale Physical Activity Survey and the Chair Stand Test were the instruments used. Results: There were significant differences between sexes in muscle area (p<0.001) in the Chair Stand Test (p=0.028) and the walk index (p=0.029), with higher values in men. The muscle area and the Chair Stand Test correlated significantly with the walk index (r=0.445, p<0.005, and r=0.522, p<0.001, respectively) and the total weekly activity index (r=0.430, p<0.005, and r=0.519, p<0.001, respectively). In the multiple linear regression models for the total weekly activity index, muscle area and the Chair Stand Test, only the latter behaved as a predictor variable. Conclusions: Muscle strength and muscle mass of quadriceps showed a significant association with the physical activity level in older people. Leg muscle strength was useful to reveal muscle mass and physical activity level in older people, which is relevant as a clinical practice indicator.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Latorre-Román, P., Arévalo-Arévalo, J. M., & García-Pinillos, F. (2016). Asociación entre la fuerza de las piernas y el área de sección muscular transversal del músculo cuádriceps femoral y el grado de actividad física en octogenarios. Biomedica, 36(2), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v36i2.2654

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free