Rat cultured neuronal and glial cells respond differently to toxicity of unconjugated bilirubin

106Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

High levels of unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) can be neurotoxic. Nevertheless, the mechanism of UCB interaction with neural cells is still unknown. This study investigates whether cultured rat neurons and astrocytes respond differently to UCB exposure. UCB toxicity was evaluated by lactate dehydrogenase release, induction of apoptosis, cytoskeleton degeneration, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction, and glutamate uptake. Primary cultures of rat brain astrocytes and neurons were incubated at 37°C with 85.5 μM UCB plus 28.5 μM albumin for 4 h. In assays of glutamate uptake, cells were exposed to 80-120 μM UCB plus 100 μM albumin for 15 min. The results showed that after incubation with 85.5 μM UCB, lactate dehydrogenase release was greater in neurons than in astrocytes (38% versus 14%, p < 0.05). Also, levels of apoptosis were markedly enhanced in neurons (29% versus 19%, p < 0.01). In accordance, neuronal cytoskeleton disassembly was evident during incubation with 85.5 μM UCB, whereas equivalent effects on astrocytes required as much as 171 μM. Conversely, inhibition of MTT metabolism and glutamate uptake by UCB was more pronounced in astrocytes than in neurons (74% versus 60%, p < 0.05 and 41% to 56% versus 25% to 33%, p < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, the study demonstrates that astrocytes are more susceptible to inhibition of glutamate uptake and MTT reduction by UCB, whereas neurons are more sensitive to cell death by necrosis or apoptosis. These results suggest that UCB is toxic to both astrocytes and neurons, although through distinct pathways.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, R. F. M., Rodrigues, C. M. P., & Brites, D. (2002). Rat cultured neuronal and glial cells respond differently to toxicity of unconjugated bilirubin. Pediatric Research, 51(4 I), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-200204000-00022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free