Negative consequences of felt violations: The deeper the relationship, the stronger the reaction

47Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Drawing from past research suggesting that high prior commitment leads to stronger reactions to unfairness in the workplace (Brockner, Tyler, & Cooper-Schneider, 1992), we predicted that those forming relational as opposed to transactional psychological contracts would exhibit stronger detrimental effects of felt violation on job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and job performance. We also predicted a combined effect of personality and violation on these outcomes. Self- and supervisor-reported data (N= 331 dyads) collected from a variety of organisations supported our predictions. In general, relational contract terms were associated with stronger violation-outcome relationships, and transactional contract terms were associated with weaker relationships. Similarly, four of the Big Five dimensions (extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, and openness to experience) moderated the violation-outcome relationships such that it was stronger for higher levels of these traits. © 2011 The Authors. Applied Psychology: An International Review © 2011 International Association of Applied Psychology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raja, U., Johns, G., & Bilgrami, S. (2011). Negative consequences of felt violations: The deeper the relationship, the stronger the reaction. Applied Psychology, 60(3), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00441.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free