Endothelin(A)-receptor antagonism attenuates pulmonary hypertension in porcine endotoxin shock

23Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Porcine endotoxin shock is characterized by pulmonary hypertension, decreased mean arterial pressure and deteriorated cardiac performance. These pathophysiological findings are accompanied by increased plasma endothelin-1 levels. Previous studies have shown that both the pulmonary and systemic circulation are improved by combined endothelin(A)- and endothelin(B)- receptor antagonism. This study was designed to evaluate further the specific involvement of the endothelin(A)-receptor in cardiopulmonary pathophysiology during endotoxin shock. In a porcine endotoxin shock model, the endothelin(A)-receptor antagonist PD 155080 was administered after the onset of endotoxaemia. Cardiopulmonary vascular changes, dynamic lung compliance, oxygen-related variables and plasma levels of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity were compared with a control group receiving only endotoxin. PD 155080 counteracted the increase in pulmonary artery pressure seen in control animals. In contrast, cardiac performance was not improved. Dynamic lung compliance was not affected by PD 155080. Plasma levels of endothelin- 1-like immunoreactivity increased to a similar degree in both groups. These findings indicate that the endothelin system is involved in the pathophysiology of endotoxin shock. Furthermore, the change in pulmonary circulation seen in the present shock model is to a large extent mediated by the endothelin(A)-receptor mechanism. In view of previous findings, the deterioration of cardiac performance may involve the endothelin(B)-receptor, either alone or in combination with the endothelin(A)-receptor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wanecek, M., Oldner, A., Rudehill, A., Sollevi, A., Alving, K., & Weitzberg, E. (1999). Endothelin(A)-receptor antagonism attenuates pulmonary hypertension in porcine endotoxin shock. European Respiratory Journal, 13(1), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.99.13114599

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free