Resistance to Fusarium head blight in oats based on analyses of multiple field and greenhouse studies

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) and the mycotoxins produced by its causal agents in oats (Avena sativa L.) have become a growing problem in northern countries over the last decades. The development of resistant cultivars would offer a highly needed and economical solution to the problem. To tackle the high genotype×environment interaction of FHB, a combined analysis was carried out on eight greenhouse and 13 field experiments inoculated with DON-producing Fusarium species. Our data included 406 oat genotypes consisting of Nordic cultivars, breeding lines and potentially resistant gene bank accessions. High variation in the DON accumulation estimates in the material shows that the selection of genotypes with better resistance would be valuable. The greenhouse and field studies resulted in significantly different oat genotype susceptibility rankings for both DON and Fusarium infected kernels. The results obtained from the field experiments have more practical relevance for farmers and breeders for the identification of DON resistant cultivars than greenhouse screenings. Days to maturity and the plant height of the genotypes both significantly affected the Fusarium infections and DON in the field. The relationship between Fusarium infected kernels, DONand germination capacity provide an insight into the composition of genotypes with resistance. The core set of 30 oat genotypes, which were phenotyped in several experiments, provides valuable examples of both highly susceptible and moderately resistant oat genotypes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hautsalo, J., Jauhiainen, L., Hannukkala, A., Manninen, O., Veteläinen, M., Pietilä, L., … Jalli, M. (2020). Resistance to Fusarium head blight in oats based on analyses of multiple field and greenhouse studies. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 158(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-020-02039-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free