Occupational risk factors for systemic lupus erythematosus: A nationwide study based on hospitalizations in Sweden

13Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To investigate possible associations between occupation and hospitalization for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a nationwide study. Methods. A nationwide database was constructed in Sweden by linking the Swedish Census to the Hospital Discharge Register to obtain data on all first hospitalizations with a primary or secondary diagnosis of SLE in adults during the study period (1970 to 2008). Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% CI were calculated for different occupations. Two cohorts were defined based on occupational titles recorded in Swedish census data in 1970 and 1980. Results. A total of 8921 male and 42290 female hospitalizations for SLE were retrieved in individuals aged over 15 years. High education (> 12 yrs) was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for SLE among both women (SIR = 0.73) and men (SIR = 0.72). Among men with the same occupation in 2 consecutive censuses, increased risks (SIR) > 2.0 were present among artistic workers (2.52); shop managers and assistants (3.63); miners and quarry workers (6.04); shoe and leather workers (6.93); plumbers (2.21); other construction workers (2.08); glass, ceramic and tile workers (4.43); chimney sweeps (4.54); and military personnel (3.01). Among women with the same occupation in 2 consecutive censuses, no occupation was associated with SIR > 2.0. Conclusion. Occupation may carry significantly increased risk of hospital admission for SLE. Especially among men, several occupations were associated with increased risks for SLE. The Journal of Rheumatology Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, X., Sundquist, J., Sundquist, K., & Zöller, B. (2012). Occupational risk factors for systemic lupus erythematosus: A nationwide study based on hospitalizations in Sweden. Journal of Rheumatology, 39(4), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110789

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free