The decision of Septimius Severus and Caracalla on longi temporis praescriptio (BGU 267 and P.Strass. 22)

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the provinces, the emperor is the representative of the centralized empire and in his decisions and regulations he therefore mainly used Roman law. The institute of long-lasting possession has a scholarly history of being traced back to either Roman or provincial law, and thus the debates encapsulate many of the recurring tensions between provincial practice and centralizing tendencies. Through a detailed study of two documents pertaining to the longi temporis praescriptio that record the decision of Septimius Severus and Caracalla (BGU 267 and P. Strass. 22), this article locates the origins of the institute firmly in a provincial context and explains how the emperor was confronted with the requirements of provincial legal practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plisecka, A. (2020). The decision of Septimius Severus and Caracalla on longi temporis praescriptio (BGU 267 and P.Strass. 22). In Law in the Roman Provinces (pp. 65–83). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844082.003.0005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free