Comparative survival and cost-effectiveness of advanced therapies for end-stage heart failure

124Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for end-stage heart failure include inotrope-dependent medical therapy, orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy or bridge to transplant. Methods and Results: We developed a state-transition model to simulate 4 treatment options and associated morbidity and mortality. Transition probabilities, costs, and utilities were estimated from published sources. Calculated outcomes included survival, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses were performed on model parameters to test robustness. Average life expectancy for OHT-eligible patients is estimated at 1.1 years, with 39% surviving to 1 year. OHT with a median wait time of 5.6 months is estimated to increase life expectancy to 8.5 years, and costs 3.8 additional life-years for patients waiting ≥6 months, but does not meet conventional costeffectiveness thresholds. Destination therapy-LVAD significantly improves life expectancy in OHT-ineligible patients. However, further reductions in adverse events or improved quality of life are needed for destination therapy-LVAD to be cost effective. © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Long, E. F., Swain, G. W., & Mangi, A. A. (2014). Comparative survival and cost-effectiveness of advanced therapies for end-stage heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure, 7(3), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free