A randomized clinical trial comparing delivery of behavioral pediatric obesity treatment using standard and enhanced motivational approaches

36Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To examine the efficacy of an adjunct motivational and autonomy-enhancing intervention (self-directed) for behavioral family-based pediatric obesity relative to the standard prescription of uniform behavioral skills use and interventionist goal assignment (prescribed). Methods In this randomized clinical trial, 72 overweight/obese children and their parents/caregivers were assigned to either self-directed or prescribed intervention for 20 weeks, with approaches diverging after week 5. Anthropometric measurements from child and participating parent at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were evaluated for change (n = 59 in follow-up analyses). Results The approaches demonstrated similar child body mass index (BMI) z-score and parent BMI change from baseline to posttreatment and throughout follow-up, with child and parent weight status lower than baseline at 2 years after treatment cessation. Conclusions An adjunct motivational and autonomy-enhancing approach to behavioral family-based pediatric obesity treatment is a viable alternative to the standard intervention approach. © 2013 Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saelens, B. E., Lozano, P., & Scholz, K. (2013). A randomized clinical trial comparing delivery of behavioral pediatric obesity treatment using standard and enhanced motivational approaches. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 38(9), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst054

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free