Modular maintenance instructions architecture (MMIA)

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The study consists of a literature study and a case study. The need for a method via which to handle instruction complexity was identified in both studies. The proposed method was developed based on methods from the literature and experience from the case company. Design/methodology/approach: The purpose of the study presented in this paper is to investigate how linking different maintenance domains in a modular maintenance instruction architecture can help reduce the complexity of maintenance instructions. Findings: The proposed method combines knowledge from the operational and physical domains to reduce the number of instruction task variants. In a case study, the number of instruction task modules was reduced from 224 to 20, covering 83% of the maintenance performed on emergency shutdown valves. Originality/value: The study showed that the other methods proposed within the body of maintenance literature mainly focus on the development of modular instructions, without the reduction of complexity and non-value-adding variation observed in the product architecture literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sigsgaard, K. V., Agergaard, J. K., Mortensen, N. H., Hansen, K. B., & Ge, J. (2022). Modular maintenance instructions architecture (MMIA). Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 29(5), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-08-2021-0063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free