Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002-2005

65Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Woman's age is an independent factor determining the success of assisted reproductive technology treatment. This study presents the age-specific success rate of first autologous fresh treatment in Australia during 2002-2005. METHODS: This is a retrospective population-based study of 36 412 initiated first autologous fresh cycles conducted in Australian clinics during 2002-2005. Pregnancy and live delivery rates per initiated cycle were determined for each age. RESULTS: The overall live delivery rate per initiated cycle was 20.4% with the highest success rate in women aged between 22 and 36 years. Male factor only infertility had a higher live delivery rate (22.0%) than female factor only infertility (19.2%). Advancing woman's age was associated with a decline in success rate. For women ≥30 years, each additional 1 year in age was associated with an 11% (99% CI: 10-12%) reduction in the chance of achieving pregnancy and a 13% (99% CI: 12-14%) reduction in the chance of a live delivery. If women aged 35 years or older would have had their first autologous fresh treatment 1 year earlier, 15% extra live deliveries would be expected. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that women aged 35 years or older should be encouraged to seek early fertility assessment and treatment where clinically indicated. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y. A., Healy, D., Black, D., & Sullivan, E. A. (2008). Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002-2005. Human Reproduction, 23(7), 1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free