Creating High-Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’

376Citations
Citations of this article
820Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we argue that integrative literature reviews are among the most useful vehicles for advancing knowledge and furthering research in a topic domain. Integrative literature reviews are strongly anchored in a representative description of a field, but add new insights via a critical analysis and synthesis of the field’s literature. Based on this definition, we explicate the ways that scholars can (1) define the ‘space’ for an integrative review (i.e., how they can justify and bound an integrative review), and (2) synthesize insights gained from the review to develop a new perspective or point of view on the literature. We illustrate these points with several of the most highly-cited manuscripts published in the Academy of Management Annals. Finally, we close by arguing why these points make integrative reviews most useful for advancing knowledge and furthering research in the area of management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elsbach, K. D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating High-Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews.’ Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12581

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free