Modified Seldinger technique for internal jugular open central venous line insertion in neonates: merging two different manoeuvers

  • Shalaby M
  • Salama R
  • Mansour M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Central venous line insertion in neonates is an important and lifesaving procedure. It can carry sig- nificant risks and complications, including death, at the time of insertion or later. We aimed to retrospectively assess the modified Seldinger technique for open placement of a central venous catheter in neonates, regarding its safety, feasibility, operative time, and preservation of the patency of the internal jugular vein. This study was conducted on 120 neonates from March 2018 to March 2020. We closely monitored the pulse for the detection of arrhythmia or bradycardia, which might be caused during the insertion of the guide wire or the tip of the catheter. Post-operative X-ray was done immediately after the end of the procedure for all cases, to determine the site of the central venous catheter and to detect the presence of pneumothorax. Results: Arrhythmia was observed in 9 cases (7.5%), and blood oozing in 5 cases (4.1%). There were 3 cases of pneumothorax (2.5%), 2 cases of neck hematoma in two cases (1.6%), 6 cases of internal jugular vein thrombosis (5%), and dislodging of the catheter in 3 cases (2.5%). There were no cases of arterial puncture, failure of cannulation, or haemothorax in our study. Conclusions: The modified Seldinger technique insertion for open central venous line in neonates is a safe, accessi- ble, and feasible method, especially in centers that lack the experience of ultrasound-guided insertion in neonates

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shalaby, M. M., Salama, R. M., & Mansour, M. A. (2021). Modified Seldinger technique for internal jugular open central venous line insertion in neonates: merging two different manoeuvers. Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette, 69(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-021-00078-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free