Efficacy and adverse events of oral isotretinoin for acne: a systematic review

  • Vallerand I
  • Lewinson R
  • Farris M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite many years of clinical use of isotretinoin, a comprehensive review of evi- dence for isotretinoin therapy in patients with acne is lacking. We searched MED- LINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, relevant web pages and bibliographies for randomized controlled trials in acne evaluating isotretinoin vs. control (placebo or other therapy). Data were extracted and summarized descriptively. Eleven trials were identified (total 760 patients randomized), containing mostly men. Mean treatment ages ranged from 18 to 47?9 years and participants generally had mod- erate-to-severe acne. Across all trials, isotretinoin therapy reduced acne lesion counts by a clinically relevant amount, and always by a greater amount than con- trol, which was either placebo (two studies), oral antibiotics (seven studies) or other control (two studies). Across trials with an overall low risk of bias, two of three demonstrated statistically significant differences between isotretinoin and control. The frequency of adverse events was twice as high with isotretinoin (751 events) than with control (388 events). More than half of all adverse events were dermatological and related to dryness. Adverse events from isotretinoin causing participant withdrawal from trials (12 patients) included Stevens–Johnson syndrome, cheilitis, xerosis, acne flare, photophobia, elevated liver enzymes, decreased appetite, headaches and depressed mood. This review suggests that iso- tretinoin is effective in reducing acne lesion counts, but adverse events are com- mon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vallerand, I. A., Lewinson, R. T., Farris, M. S., Sibley, C. D., Ramien, M. L., Bulloch, A. G. M., & Patten, S. B. (2018). Efficacy and adverse events of oral isotretinoin for acne: a systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16195

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free